On Friday, December 10, 2004, 6:33:19 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Chris Lilley wrote: >>BH> Use of the +xml convention implies that such metadata needs to be >>BH> overridden >> >>No, it does not. An xml encoding declaration is sender provided >>metadata. However, in the case where a charset parameter is allowed, and >>where it can be different, and thus where one has to win over the other, >>metadata is indeed being overridden. I agree with you that silent >>recovery here is not inthe user interest and a warning should be shown. BH> You either missed that the mail you responded to did not discuss the BH> charset parameter at all, or you are trying to suggest that there is BH> a character encoding that is based on gzip. Neither, but you missed that I was deleting the bits about gzip and responding only to character encoding, not content transfer encoding. I should have signalled that with a change to the subject line. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture GroupReceived on Friday, 10 December 2004 23:25:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:53 GMT