- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:25:25 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, ietf-types@iana.org
On Friday, December 10, 2004, 6:33:19 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Chris Lilley wrote: >>BH> Use of the +xml convention implies that such metadata needs to be >>BH> overridden >> >>No, it does not. An xml encoding declaration is sender provided >>metadata. However, in the case where a charset parameter is allowed, and >>where it can be different, and thus where one has to win over the other, >>metadata is indeed being overridden. I agree with you that silent >>recovery here is not inthe user interest and a warning should be shown. BH> You either missed that the mail you responded to did not discuss the BH> charset parameter at all, or you are trying to suggest that there is BH> a character encoding that is based on gzip. Neither, but you missed that I was deleting the bits about gzip and responding only to character encoding, not content transfer encoding. I should have signalled that with a change to the subject line. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 23:25:25 UTC