- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
- Cc: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Antoine Quint <ml@graougraou.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Dean Jackson wrote: > > > > > > Although you are probably aware, the reason for this type of issue > > > is that CSS doesn't offer any way to "package" property names and > > > ensure avoiding clashes with other vocabularies. > > > > Prefixing every property with "svg-" would do that. > > So would prefixing the majority of the CSS properties with "html-". > Half :) There's nothing HTML-specific about CSS propertes. > > > One way to solve the CSS WG issue is that these new attributes could > > > remain XML attributes and not be made available too via CSS > > > mechanisms. > > > > Personally, for many of the above properties I think that would be > > much better. For example, the 'focusable' property doesn't seem like > > something you'd want to change from a stylesheet. > > Yeah, it seems like something we should consider. We'd still have to > resolve how to style such content. I don't see what you mean. Could you expand on this? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2004 21:00:04 UTC