W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Few questions about SVG 1.2

From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:31:30 +1000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040830023130.GB8645@mcc.id.au>

Me:
> > I have a couple of questions about the SVG 1.2 draft.  (Wasn't a new one
> > forthcoming?)

Robin Berjon:
> It is :)

Oh good. :-)

Robin Berjon:
> I believe that the point is more to get the SMIL engine to understand 
> how to animate something rather than to get the CSS engine to know what 
> different values there are. But I get the feeling I'm missing part of 
> your question, I'm not sure what to describe in terms of "what would 
> happen".

I was thinking that if you defined the trait then you would be able to
then style your element with that CSS property.  But that isn't
possible?  That was my worry, that there would be no CSS syntax to use
for specifying the matrix value.  If it is only for animation then I
guess there is no problem.

Is there any advantage to being able to specify whether the trait is of
type XML or CSS?  Is it that CSS traits will be inherited and XML traits
not?  Maybe I should just wait for sXBL to come out. :)

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack
|  Web: http://mcc.id.au/
|  ICQ: 26955922
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 02:31:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:53 UTC