W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: question on SVG Tiny 1.2 DOM

From: Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@enst.fr>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 16:42:21 +0200
Message-ID: <4081424D.9060400@enst.fr>
To: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

G'day again

Dean Jackson wrote:

>>  2. the difficult ones: why is <g> not in this list ?
> I don't know. Unless I was asleep, I can't remember the discussion
> of why these are limited. I think it should be there.
>>  whereas I can understand why <set> is not in, why are the <animate*> 
>> not in ?
> I think they all should be there.
>>  3. the wild ones: would <audio> and <video> be allowed in this list ?
> Again, unless I've missed something (very likely) I can't see any
> reason to limit createElementNS to anything other than the complete
> set of elements allowed by the current profile.

Very good! I cannot see a reason either, which is why I was concerned.
We have applications for scenes that are loaded piece by piece, and not 
being able to construct most of the scene dynamically is very limiting. 
The scene is never replaced, it just evolves.
Best regards
Received on Saturday, 17 April 2004 10:42:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:58 UTC