W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Adobe plugin security fixes reccommend proprietary EMBED

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:25:37 -0000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <bmgtio$cre$1@sea.gmane.org>


"Tobias Reif" <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote in message
news:3F8BF0BB.20703@pinkjuice.com...
>
> Jim Ley wrote:
>  > [...] the W3 HTML versions are only recommendations,
>
> Just in case this confuses some: Final SVG specifications such as
>    SVG 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/

Indeed, but there are also HTML versions such as the ISO one, which are not
W3 recommendations, this shows the flexibility of HTML and demonstrates a
method where you can have valid HTML (or even XHTML) documents, that contain
other attributes.  When publishing for a small set of user agents (such as
those that support the Adobe SVG Plugin) it seems to me entirely appropriate
to use such methods as part of your QA process.

I don't publish SVG's other than as a link, I don't believe embedding in a
page at all is appropriate for the web today, however it might be
appropriate in intranets. and there embed is the most sensible approach.

Jim.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2003 09:26:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:26 GMT