W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: SVG 1.2 WD comments: RCC+XSLT and others

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:03:41 +0100
To: www-svg@w3.org
Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
Message-ID: <20031117090340.GA3147@linux>

On Mon 2003-11-17 Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Since XSLT does not specify a default namespace for elements
> referred to in an XPath expression (a snag I'm sure most people
> using XSLT will have been caught on) does this mean expressions will
> require lots of prefixes?

Check XSLT 2.0's

XSLT 2 might be finished soon enough to be considered for SVG 1.2, and
there are so many more advantages of XSLT 2 over XSLT 1 (there also
are some arguable aspects though) that I suggest to seriously consider

They just published last call versions of the main specs, see

The example in
specifies XSLT 1.1
which is an abandoned draft.
So the 1.1 in the line
  <xsl:stylesheet id="diamond" version="1.1"
should be changed to 1.0; or 2.0 in the future (XSLT 2.0 being a draft
that's being developed actively).

BTW, I think the example demonstrates a useful and interesting
concept, XSLT in SVG makes sense.


Vim as XML Editor
Received on Monday, 17 November 2003 03:58:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:57 UTC