On Sat, 17 May 2003 10:14:33 +0200, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >All CSS properties are also available as xml presentational >attributes, with identical syntax. > >Thus, all presentational attributes use the CSS url() syntax. Oh, I understand that. The reason for my post is that the current SVG spec uses the symbol <uri> in two different ways. In other words, you can't have a single grammar that describes a <uri>, because there are actually two different things that the spec calls <uri>. I think it would be better if the spec used distinct symbols to represent the two different interpretations. Steve Schafer Fenestra Technologies Corp http://www.fenestra.com/Received on Saturday, 17 May 2003 22:13:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:22 GMT