"Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org> wrote in message news:176274136468.20030502135950@w3.org... > > On Thursday, May 1, 2003, 3:26:31 PM, Dean wrote: > > >> Are <video> and <image> interchangeable elements, much like smil ? > > DJ> Yes, except for the animation attributes. > > Ok, lets discuss that. I don't think that is a good idea. I don't either but the ability to give an image a duration etc, would be very useful in the case of SVG referenced images that have a timeline just like video, indeed a non-interactive SVG animation is just like a video and it would be good to control it as such. Perhaps the one mandated video format could be SVG? Jim.Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 07:43:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:22 GMT