W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: video in SVG1.2

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 22:39:59 -0000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <b9ij7a$v7d$4@main.gmane.org>


"Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org> wrote in message
news:176274136468.20030502135950@w3.org...
>
> On Thursday, May 1, 2003, 3:26:31 PM, Dean wrote:
>
> >> Are <video> and <image> interchangeable elements, much like smil ?
>
> DJ> Yes, except for the animation attributes.
>
> Ok, lets discuss that. I don't think that is a good idea.

I don't either but the ability to give an image a duration etc, would be
very useful in the case of SVG referenced images that have a timeline just
like video, indeed a non-interactive SVG animation is just like a video and
it would be good to control it as such.

Perhaps the one mandated video format could be SVG?

Jim.
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 07:43:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:25 GMT