W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: SVG 1.2 12.1.1 The Progress Event

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 15:06:39 +0200
Message-ID: <3EDDEEDF.3090103@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org

Jim Ley wrote:


> I can't believe I'm unique in serving up 404 jpegs! * Squiggle especially
> needs 404's to be content-negotiated, to something it can understand, rather
> than the traditonal .  (there's a similar situation with HTTP 302/307 status
> which RFC 2616 says "The entity of the response SHOULD contain a short
> hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s)" - but doesn't suggest
> what mark-up language I should use for that note.)


For hypertext (which SHOULD be used according to that RFC), I suggest 
the one called HyperText Markup Language.

But I agree that it makes sense to serve other versions if the UA 
doesn't accept (X)HTML. So if a UA like Squiggle says it doesn't accept 
HTML, my server should ask what it would prefer, and serve that. In this 
case, SVG for example (which is more accessible than JPEG in many if not 
most cases).

Tobi

-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 09:06:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:25 GMT