W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: SVG 1.2 11.4 Window Object

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:21:13 +0200
Message-ID: <3EDDBA09.4060906@expway.fr>
To: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

Tobias Reif wrote:
> Dean Jackson wrote:
>  > We don't have a canonical version of SVG so I assume any valid
>  > serialisation is legal. If anyone disagrees, speak up now.
> 
> I think I agree (although the above formulation can be misunderstood; 
> the serialized SVG AFAICS could be invalid in respect to normative 
> schemas (DTD/RNG/...)).

Yes, but forcing the viewers to only output valid SVG would force them to ship 
with a validator. I think that's too high a constraint.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 05:21:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:25 GMT