"Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:F935DF3D-AFF2-11D7-B782-0003939B5AD0@btinternet.com... > > encoding="iso-8859-1" & http://validator.w3.org > > Is there a great reason why the SVG images* in the spec: > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/ don't validate? > Is there a plan to validate SVG images at some time in the future? > This seems a rather poor practice, web accessibility and SVG have such > great potential! The current release version of the validator has many known issues with XML, when validating XML and discovering errors, please check with the beta version at http://validator.w3.org:8001/ - this correctly validates the above document. The Validator is of course developed by a few people most of them volunteers outside of the W3 itself doing it in their spare time, unfortunately getting releases out takes time. I understand Terje is going to take some of his holiday entitlement from work to get the beta into a release state soon, until then consider using Page Valet's XML tools for validating XML such as SVG. Jim.Received on Sunday, 6 July 2003 17:41:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:22 GMT