Re: dom-svg-BE-02

On Saturday, July 5, 2003, 3:45:58 AM, Sigurd wrote:


SL> Sorry, I meant, shouldn't it have been:

SL> "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"

Knew what you meant. Yes, it should.

Its fixed in the SVG 1.1 test suite
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/htmlframe/full-struct-dom-01-t.html


-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org