W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Suggestions

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 10:48:02 +0100
Message-ID: <3E325D52.2000605@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org

Sigurd Lerstad wrote:

 > Okay.. I should say my opinions for SVG 1.2 before it's too late.. I'm
 > going to be quick.
 > 1.
 > remove <image>

I'm not sure if there are (m)any reasons to make SVG 1.0 

 > and have a xlink:href on <foreignObject> that links to
 > an external resource, or
 > have <externalObject> in place of <image> and have <inlineObject>
 > instead of <foreignObject>
 > This way, you first of all get closer to XHTML

*Why* would this be a good thing in this case?

 > with the removal of
 > <img> and that <object> is always used instead, and you get a much
 > clearer link between embedded/non-embedded objects, which should
 > render the same way.

I don't understand this.

[I commenting only on this one suggestion, which doesn't mean I agree 
with all the others.]


Received on Saturday, 25 January 2003 04:48:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:55 UTC