W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: SVG 1.1 and SVG Mobile are W3C Recommendations.

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:49:21 -0000
Message-ID: <043e01c2bc16$cbe5c290$d9969dc3@Moomin>
To: <www-svg@w3.org>
Cc: <www-qa@w3.org>, <timbl@w3.org>

"Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>

> The W3C SVG Working Group is pleased to announce that SVG 1.1[1] and
> SVG Mobile Profiles: SVG Basic and SVG Tiny[2] are now W3C
> Recommendations. See the Press Release[3], Testimonials[4] and
> Frequently Asked Questions[5].
> [1]  http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11

It seems that at some point between PR and REC of SVG 1.1, my issue on the
High Peformance Dynamic SVG viewer (
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2002Nov/0304.html ) fell into
limbo and was not formally addressed.  Can we have it addressed please?

Equally, how do I ensure in future that issues I raise are addressed, the
Process document makes it clear that the public can raise issues, but I do
not see any way to ensure they're acknowledged and addressed.  I would like
to suggest that issues lists are public, and every issue raised is
acknowledged in a public archive within a short time period.  This would've
allowed me to see that my issue had been missed by the Working Group, and
could've re-raised it to ensure it was addressed.

Equally the lack of a public mailing list for process issues makes
discussion of process issues difficult.


Jim Ley.
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 16:54:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:55 UTC