> Having said this, wouldn't it be just enough to perform/support just one-to-one matching of > character(s) and glyph(s) simply ignoring the multiple character representation within the unicode > attributes. Is there a possibility that we may miss the ligature "ffl" altogether or would we Indic scripts are very dependant on ligatures. As well as conjunct consonants, I believe that vowel consonant pairs are taught as ligatures, rather than as rules for compounding the consonant and vowel mark. If I remember correctly, Unicode doesn't distingush between isolated vowels and vowel marks, but even if it does, I don't remember seeing anything in SVG that would allow the vowel to be correctly placed relative to the consonant without using a ligature, especially as the short i vowel precedes the consonent glyph that it follows in the Unicode, and displaces it right.. I think you either have to remove SVG fonts from the profile, or have a sub-profile which only supports certain scripts.Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 11:27:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:21 GMT