- From: J. David Eisenberg <catcode@catcode.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:32:56 -0500 (CDT)
- To: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com
- cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote: > > In my view a schema is particularly helpful when it is also available as a > free-standing .xsd document. This gives the opportunity to open the file in, > for example, Mozilla or XMLSpy where one can collapse/expand the tree > structure provided by the default stylesheet in Mozilla or use the > proprietary view in XMLSpy. I find that helpful to be able to study specific > aspects of the schema. I agree that having a schema is useful; I'm not convinced that W3C XML Schema is the best choice. I'd much prefer Relax NG, which is easier to write and easier to read. It also has a more sound technical base. See http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/msg00217.html for James Clark's analysis. > > I would, therefore, encourage the WG to develop a full W3C XML Schema for SVG > 1.2. > > Andrew Watt > -- J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 11:34:59 UTC