W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Grid layouts and zIndex.

From: Fred P. <fprog26@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 03:12:57 -0400
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <BAY2-F128DB2wdMeMs000004e3e@hotmail.com>

>It's been discussed a number of times about grid layout systems, and their
>desirability, has anyone considered how this might be squared with the
>current painters model, which necessitates content appearing above another
>element be specifies later in the stream than content below.

As far as I understand grid layout,
the point is to have objects without
X and Y attributes.

In other words having

<!-- NOTICE: NO X, NO Y on use -->
<use xlink:href='#object'/>

<!-- NOTICE: NO X, NO Y on rect -->
<rect style='fill:#101212' width='10' height='10'/>

<!-- NOTICE: NO X, NO Y on g -->
<g id='b'>
<!-- NOTICE: Have X,Y on use
     so we can offset it from the grid a bit  -->
<use xlink:href='#object' x='4' y='6' />


if you want superposed images use
<g id='object'>
  ... stuff with X,Y

then simply <use> it offset.

Tell me now where is the problem
with your grid, painting layers
or 3D grid thing?

>This means that simple grid mechanisms will prevent us from doing this as 
>do not know the location of the items undersneath and we'd need a 3 
>dimensional grid.  The other option is of course to throw away the painters 
>model, and have full z-index control when each grid element can then be 
>appropriately laid out.  That's quite a change though...



Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*   
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 03:13:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:55 UTC