W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:34:41 +0100
Message-ID: <3DDE5CA1.8020600@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org

Vadim Plessky wrote:

> On Thursday 21 November 2002 11:58 pm, Tobias Reif wrote:
> |  Vadim Plessky wrote:
> |  > On Thursday 21 November 2002 3:28 pm, Tobias Reif wrote:
> |  > |  Vadim Plessky wrote:
> |  > |   > |  > We
> |  > |   > |  > do not smooth curves before rendering.
> |  > |   > |
> |  > |   > |  I'm much more interested in a solution than in an explanation
> |  > |   > | :)
> |  > |   >
> |  > |   > You want good rendering for text?
> |  > |   > Than pick up latest FreeType release (2.1.3)
> |  > |
> |  > |  No, I don't just want a good viewer. I want consistent, best
> |  > | identical rendering *across* implementations. I expressed above that I
> |  > | think the spec needs to be clearer.
> |  >
> |  > Than talk to Adobe to switch their ASV from closed-source implementation
> |  > to FreeType.
> |  > And ask Batik guys to use FreeType, too.
> |
> |  How would that affect the spec?
> 
> I guess *you* were speaking about rendering quality, no?
> And it was your proposal to add some changes to specs, defining rendering 
> quality?


Yes, so FreeType is of no help.

Tobi

-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 11:40:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:23 GMT