W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]

From: Thomas E Deweese <thomas.deweese@kodak.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:18:28 -0500
Message-ID: <15837.19876.810959.401160@frog.rl.kodak.com>
To: Vadim Plessky <plessky@cnt.ru>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org


>>>>> "VP" == Vadim Plessky <plessky@cnt.ru> writes:

VP> Than talk to Adobe to switch their ASV from closed-source
VP> implementation to FreeType.  And ask Batik guys to use FreeType,
VP> too.  

    Does FreeType do stroking and dashing of outlines?  Typically
this isn't needed for rendering text but is needed for svg.

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:18:34 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robert Diblasi: "SVG Working Group interested in using W3's Annotea to annotate SVG spec?"
Previous message: Tobias Reif: "Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]"
In reply to: Vadim Plessky: "Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]"
Next in thread: Vadim Plessky: "Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]"
Reply: Vadim Plessky: "Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]"
Reply: Leonard Rosenthol: "Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:46 GMT