W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Identical rendering? [was Re: SVG 1.2 General feedback]

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:10:39 +0100
Message-ID: <3DDC166F.1050009@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org

Thomas E Deweese wrote:

 >     Given your interest in high quality rendering [...]
 > [...] the
 > anti-aliasing was not very high
 > quality.
 >     Well, SVG can be used in a large number of places and this is
 > certainly one of them.  You should take a look at Batik it is
 > currently the most conformant SVG renderer available (unfortunately
 > for you it does not do font hinting at all).  But it is certainly
 > capable of taking the place of a tool like GhostScript (who's font
 > rendering is generally much worse than Batik's - IMHO).

Two issues I found with Squiggles rendering quality:


Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 18:10:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:54 UTC