W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: 1.2 feedback: printing

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:06:39 +0100
Message-ID: <3DDB96EF.7000700@expway.fr>
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
CC: www-svg@w3.org

Jim Ley wrote:
> "Tobias Reif" <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote in message
> 
>>But wouldn't it be helpful to be able to validate static SVGs against a
>>static profile, and then be able to say "nothing moves in this SVG, and
>>nothing is interactive; a rasterized version will show the same as the
>>SVG (obviously much less accessible etc, but visually equivalent)".
> 
> It would be great to have this, and also say so at the HTTP level,
> preferable in the mime-type, but in another header if appropriate, you
> may have 2 SVG renderers, one which is really good, but doesn't support
> animation, and another which is not so good but does, it would be great
> to choose between them, before needing to look inside the document.

Defining content type parameters for this wouldn't be too difficult 
(image/svg+xml;profile=basic;version=1.1;conformance=static... possibly followed 
by various feature strings) but it might be cumbersome to mangle the headers 
properly, especially with static (ie not-generated) content.

Couldn't this be done using a CC/PP profile?

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 09:07:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:23 GMT