- From: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 06:15:03 +1100
- To: Jon Ferraiolo <jon@ferraiolo.com>
- Cc: "'Niklas Gustavsson'" <niklas@protocol7.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Jon Ferraiolo wrote: > > Good point about CSS3. Definitely, SVG 1.2 will need the namespace > enhancements at a minimum. The pseudo classes also seem useful. > > Dean, you listening? Pardon? :) Our requirements document (http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2Reqs) says 9.1 SVG *must* take into account updates to the CSS .. specification. I think it was an error that we left mention of CSS3 (especially selectors and namespaces) out of the first draft of SVG 1.2. They should have been in there, and they (most probably) will be there for draft 2. Dean > -----Original Message----- > From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Niklas Gustavsson > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 6:39 AM > To: www-svg@w3.org > Subject: SVG 1.2 and CSS3 > > > Hi > > If timing allows, could the WG consider including CSS3 support into SVG > 1.2? > Specifically CSS3 selectors (http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/) which > I > think increases the power of CSS a lot (e.g. namespace support, more > powerful attribute checking and pseduo-classes). > > /niklas > http://www.protocol7.com > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 14:15:14 UTC