W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: [svg-developers] Re: some discussion of SVG 1.2

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:00:35 +0100
Message-ID: <3DD92AC3.4050201@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org

Jim,


> that would be fine, as there's no ambiguity about what it applies to,


A prefix stands for a URI; neither is ambiguous, AFAICS.

Tobi

> yes
> it's ugly, but ugliness is less important than being unambiguous, many
> people can't even understand the xlink namespace - we should be
> protecting them from the confusion, and I think just uri is the only
> sensible solution (and the ugliness is down to the general namespace
> ugliness)
> 
> Jim.
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Monday, 18 November 2002 13:00:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:23 GMT