W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: [svg-developers] Re: some discussion of SVG 1.2

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:15:09 -0000
Message-ID: <004f01c28f26$13d8cde0$ca969dc3@emedia.co.uk>
To: <www-svg@w3.org>

"Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
> Jim Ley wrote:
>> "Tobias Reif" <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> wrote in message
>> news:3DD9166A.9000601@pinkjuice.com...
>>>Kurt Cagle wrote:
>>>>I'd think strongly about implementing XPath 2.0
>>>This would be very useful, save lots of code, and ease maintenace.
>>The syntax surely can't use the namespace prefix to make a judgement -
>>what would happen in the following situation:
>><g xmlns:ex="urn:moo">
>><rect x="0" y="0" height="10" width="10" ex:type="stepBox"/>
>><rect x="20" y="20" height="10" width="10" ex:type="stepBox"/>
>>then if I insert another rect
>><rect x="10" y="10" width="10" height="10" ex:type="stepBox"
>>that surely can't respond to the mouseover events too?
>Of course not. Presumably, prefixes in the XPath expressions would be
>mapped to  namespaces based on the current namespace context, as
>it is in XSLT.

and if that namespace context changed?   My problem with using the
prefix, is that the prefix is supposed to disappear once you've parsed
the XML, which would mean your
would have to be expanded to:
on parsing, which means why bother with the extra confusing layer - why
not just work with the namespace direct?

Received on Monday, 18 November 2002 12:18:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:54 UTC