On Thursday, November 14, 2002, 6:48:30 PM, Niklas wrote: NG> Sorry for the spamming, but I'm finding these things as I work through the NG> test suite. No worries. I am doing exactly the same thing. NG> The description of the test at NG> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/htmlframe/full-struct-frag-01-t NG> .html is, well, a bit limited :-) And the test files are all blank, is this NG> correct? It is, indeed, a test of a blank file. There was some testable assertion in the spec, I forget what exactly now. I agree the description could be greatly amplified. NG> /niklas NG> "Niklas Gustavsson" <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote in message NG> news:ar0mp5$nj5$1@main.gmane.org... >> >> Another one: >> in >> NG> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/htmlframe/full-pservers-grad-08 >> -b.html it is said that "Test that the viewer has basic capability to NG> handle >> linear gradients on fills and stroke of text" and "The rendered picture >> should match the reference image, except for possible variations in the >> labelling text (per CSS2 rules).". But this means that the viewer needs NG> SVG >> font support which is not really what your testing and will make some >> viewers that perfectly support gradients on fills and stroke of text, but >> SVG fonts, fail. >> >> /niklas >> >> "Niklas Gustavsson" <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote in message >> news:ar0l2s$g6a$1@main.gmane.org... >> > >> > Hi again >> > >> > In >> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/svggen/masking-path-04-b.svg >> > there is a text element inside a clipPath. That is not valid for the SVG >> 1.1 >> > Basic DTD that is used in that file. >> > >> > /niklas >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Thursday, 14 November 2002 12:55:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:46 GMT
