Re: More on the test suite

On Thursday, November 14, 2002, 6:48:30 PM, Niklas wrote:


NG> Sorry for the spamming, but I'm finding these things as I work through the
NG> test suite.

No worries. I am doing exactly the same thing.

NG> The description of the test at
NG> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/htmlframe/full-struct-frag-01-t
NG> .html is, well, a bit limited :-) And the test files are all blank, is this
NG> correct?

It is, indeed, a test of a blank file. There was some testable
assertion in the spec, I forget what exactly now.

I agree the description could be greatly amplified.

NG> /niklas


NG> "Niklas Gustavsson" <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote in message
NG> news:ar0mp5$nj5$1@main.gmane.org...
>>
>> Another one:
>> in
>>
NG> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/htmlframe/full-pservers-grad-08
>> -b.html it is said that "Test that the viewer has basic capability to
NG> handle
>> linear gradients on fills and stroke of text" and "The rendered picture
>> should match the reference image, except for possible variations in the
>> labelling text (per CSS2 rules).". But this means that the viewer needs
NG> SVG
>> font support which is not really what your testing and will make some
>> viewers that perfectly support gradients on fills and stroke of text, but
>> SVG fonts, fail.
>>
>> /niklas
>>
>> "Niklas Gustavsson" <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote in message
>> news:ar0l2s$g6a$1@main.gmane.org...
>> >
>> > Hi again
>> >
>> > In
>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/svggen/masking-path-04-b.svg
>> > there is a text element inside a clipPath. That is not valid for the SVG
>> 1.1
>> > Basic DTD that is used in that file.
>> >
>> > /niklas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>





-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org

Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 12:55:45 UTC