Hello Tobi, www-svg, You wrote http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2002Aug/0032.html > Why is there no element tspan allowed as child of element a? This generated a large and at times tangential discussion. It was pointed out that if tspan was allowed, one could have things like <svg> <a> <tspan dx="" dy="">stuff</tspan> </a> </svg> One thing that was not mentioned though is that schema languages such as RelaxNG and W3C XML Schema allow this situation to be resolved because they can express content models like "when an a element is a child of a text element, its content model includes tspan" So, should be better in SVG 1.2 -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 06:28:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:46 GMT