W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: The 'image/svg+xml' Media Type

From: Braden McDaniel <braden@lnk.com>
Date: 18 Jun 2002 18:17:04 -0400
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1024438624.8362.98.camel@sphinx>

On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 08:40, Jim Ley wrote:

[snip]

> > JL> whatever objections may be found to image/svg+xml .
> >
> > Such as?
> 
> I've not seen a draft... I have reservations about it being in the image
> space at all, it seems to fit better in application/*  (are there not
> risks with non svg aware agents consider image/svg+xml to be binary data
> for example?)

I don't think it's reasonable to assume "image" means the representation
isn't textual. The registry already seems to be populated with some that
are.

Braden
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 18:19:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:22 GMT