W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: The 'image/svg+xml' Media Type

From: Braden McDaniel <braden@lnk.com>
Date: 18 Jun 2002 12:56:29 -0400
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org, Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Message-Id: <1024419390.8362.66.camel@sphinx>

On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 12:50, Chris Lilley wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 5:44:11 PM, Tobias wrote:
> 
> 
> TR> Braden McDaniel wrote:
> 
> 
> >> Furthermore, the type simply is wrong-headed. "application/ecmascript"
> >> is appropriate.
> 
> 
> TR> ... "because"?
> 
> TR>  From my POV, having limited knowledge of the implications related to 
> TR> MIME Type naming, I think that application/ecmascript is better than 
> TR> text/ecmascript, because the main characteristic of a portion of ECMA 
> TR> Script code is being an application; a program. It is also text, but I 
> TR> don't view this as it's main property.
> 
> Suggest that you read the definition of 'application' in that case. it
> doesn't really fit, either.

What are you reading from? Per the quote in my other message to you, I
think the definition of "application" rather hits the nail on the head
as far as the domain of ECMAScript is concerned.

Braden
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 12:58:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:22 GMT