W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: SVG Schema: URL for XMLSchema.dtd ?

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:18:08 +0100
Message-ID: <3C4599B0.9000301@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org

(I accidently sent you an incorrect version of this mail directly)

 > THe one in the same directory as the schema.
 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-SVG11-20020108/XMLSchema.dtd

$Id: XMLSchema.dtd,v 1.1 2002/01/10 15:08:25 dean Exp $

 > This is in fact the standard one, from 

which states
$Id: XMLSchema.dtd,v 1.31 2001/10/24 15:50:16 ht Exp $

Perhaps it's better to point directly to
or to something like talked about in
  -> an XMLSchema.xsd

 >>Is there a normative DTD for W3C Schema, or should a Schema be used to
 >>validate schemas?
 > Yes :)
 > OK, seriously, yes and yes.

Err; why isn't it used then? (above, I'm talking about validating
schemas, not SVGs.)

I meant: Wouldn't a schema (XMLSchema.xsd) be more appropriate to
validate the SVG 1.1 schema?

 > The Doctype of SVG 1.1 will change. We hope to provide a normative
 > schema and possibly a non-normative DTD (unless my memory is
 > fooling me).

Sorry, I omitted a word, and switched another. I meant:

Would it make sense to change the doctype of the SVG 1.1 *schema* to 
reference a
public schema definition, via http, so that

<!DOCTYPE schema PUBLIC "[...]"

I'm sorry for the confusion :)

I'm rearranging stuff in my copy of the SVG 1.1 Schema, and need to
validate the results. In the doctype declaration of the schema,
"XMLSchema.dtd" is referenced; I just thought it might be better if this
would be changed to "http:/[...]XMLSchema.xsd".




Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 10:18:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:52 UTC