Dean, (I accidently sent you an incorrect version of this mail directly) > THe one in the same directory as the schema. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-SVG11-20020108/XMLSchema.dtd says: $Id: XMLSchema.dtd,v 1.1 2002/01/10 15:08:25 dean Exp $ ^^^^^ > This is in fact the standard one, from http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.dtd which states $Id: XMLSchema.dtd,v 1.31 2001/10/24 15:50:16 ht Exp $ ^^^^ ? Perhaps it's better to point directly to http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.dtd or to something like talked about in http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#normative-schemaSchema -> an XMLSchema.xsd >>Is there a normative DTD for W3C Schema, or should a Schema be used to >>validate schemas? >> > Yes :) > > OK, seriously, yes and yes. Err; why isn't it used then? (above, I'm talking about validating schemas, not SVGs.) I meant: Wouldn't a schema (XMLSchema.xsd) be more appropriate to validate the SVG 1.1 schema? > The Doctype of SVG 1.1 will change. We hope to provide a normative > schema and possibly a non-normative DTD (unless my memory is > fooling me). Sorry, I omitted a word, and switched another. I meant: Would it make sense to change the doctype of the SVG 1.1 *schema* to reference a public schema definition, via http, so that <!DOCTYPE schema PUBLIC "[...]" "http://www.w3.org/[*.xsd]"> I'm sorry for the confusion :) I'm rearranging stuff in my copy of the SVG 1.1 Schema, and need to validate the results. In the doctype declaration of the schema, "XMLSchema.dtd" is referenced; I just thought it might be better if this would be changed to "http:/[...]XMLSchema.xsd". Thanks, Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/ -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 10:18:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:21 GMT