W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: DOCTYPE

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:10:47 +0200
Message-ID: <3B96A2E7.7080200@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org
well, somehow they may both be correct;
the date is when version 1.0 was finalized, so perhaps they can be used 
interchangeably for version 1.0 documents,

just as
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/
points to the same as
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/

; let's see... ;)

Pankaj Kamthan wrote:

> Tobias,
> 
> "Which one of the following is correct?
> (spec)
> <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20010904//EN"
>    "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-
> 20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">
> 
> (or)
> <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN"
>    "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-
> 20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">
> 
> (or)
> ..."
> 
> This is a good one (considering the announcement of the 
> recommendation is still hot from the oven).


-- 
Tobias Reif
http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.xhtml

go_to('www.ruby-lang.org').get(ruby).play.create.have_fun
http://www.pinkjuice.com/ruby/
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 18:12:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:20 GMT