W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: DOCTYPE

From: Robert Diblasi <rdiblas@wpo.it.luc.edu>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 16:32:58 -0500
Message-Id: <sb9656a5.009@wpo.it.luc.edu>
To: <jferraio@adobe.com>, <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>, <chris@w3.org>, <dean@w3.org>, <www-svg@w3.org>
Tobias,..........I think you win for first error in the specification :- ( ...unless there is a good explanation for this

If you look at 
1.3 SVG Namespace, Public Identifier and System Identifier
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/intro.html#Namespace

<!DOCTYPE 
                      svg 
                      PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" 
                                     "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">

if look at "all' examples in SVG 1.0 recommdation :- (........you will see.....

<!DOCTYPE 
                       svg       
                       PUBLIC    "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20010904//EN" 
                                         "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">

What gives.......if it is a mistake ....needs to be fixed now!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

Tobias...I await the answer just like you..I sent it to Jon and Chris and Dean the keeper of errors



We all learn by sharing what we know
Robert A. DiBlasi



>>> Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> 09/05/01 03:09PM >>>
Which one of the following is correct?

(spec)
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20010904//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">

(or)
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">

(or)
...


-- 
Tobias Reif
http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.xhtml

go_to('www.ruby-lang.org').get(ruby).play.create.have_fun
http://www.pinkjuice.com/ruby/
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 17:51:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:20 GMT