W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2001

Re: wish list for svg 2.0

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 17:48:12 +0200
Message-ID: <3AFC09BC.D1CD9B0B@pinkjuice.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Stefan,

1) is a good point; simple tags to describe arcs are needed.
(they were on my list too
http://www.pinkjuice.com/SVG/spec-prop.xhtml#syntax )
2) is inteersting too.
3) : could you give some examples? Maybe in SVG2 pseudo-code ;)

You may want to check my wishlist:
http://www.pinkjuice.com/SVG/spec-prop.xhtml

Tobi

> 
>  i consider these 3 features worth a discussion:
> 
> 1) arc element, maybe
> <arc cx cy rx ry start-angle sweep-angle />
> 
> <arc cx cy rx />  // .. we have the <circle> element with this ..
> <arc cx cy rx ry /> // .. we have the <ellipse> element with this ..
> 
> .. and appropriate default values. ( i know of no thread discussing
> this, but i am sure it happened!)
> 
> 2) <angularGradient ..>
> * with <linearGradient> i can emulate a cylinders shading
> * with <radialGradient> a sphere's shading can be modelled
> * currently we cannot emulate the shading of a cone
> 
> 3) parameterized groups (very important)
> i am sure you discuss this. vml has something like parameterization.
> so there must be a reason not to include that
> into svg 1.0. Hopefully the argument was to delay parameterization
> until svg 2.0.
> 
> .. more may follow
> 
> --
> stefan goessner
> 

-- 
Tobias Reif
http://www.pinkjuice.com/myDigitalProfile.htm
Received on Friday, 11 May 2001 11:49:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:20 GMT