W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2001

Fwd: [Moderator Action] Index for SVG Recommendation

From: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:13:35 +1000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Cc: r_diblasi@hotmail.com
Message-ID: <20010607091335.A5642@grorg.org>
Messages only accepted from subscribers.

----- Forwarded message from Robert DiBlasi <r_diblasi@hotmail.com> -----

X-Envelope-From: www-svg-request@tux.w3.org  Wed Jun  6 13:24:21 2001
X-Originating-IP: []
From: "Robert DiBlasi" <r_diblasi@hotmail.com>
To: www-svg@w3.org
Old-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 17:23:45 -0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jun 2001 17:23:45.0587 (UTC) FILETIME=[70D0F830:01C0EEAD]
X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
Subject: [Moderator Action] Index for SVG Recommendation
X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from a daemon, ignored
X-Envelope-To: www-svg
X-UIDL: 22959d3a4aeca32554b0b1db8589cc45


Can anyone comment on the format of the index for SVG...
Is there going to be an Index?
If there is an Index what will it format be?

I ask this question because I would like to propose that the Index be all on 
one web page.....not A on one page and B on another page....

the reason to the proposal is the use functionality of local search..
If all of the information is on one page than easy to type/speak in the item 
to be searched and the search engine can find it quickly...the user does not 
have to move through each letter of the alphabet...

I would like to know how people feel about this style of formatting

We all learn by sharing what we know
Robert A. DiBlasi

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 19:15:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:29:15 UTC