Johnny Stenback wrote: > Hello all, > > It was recently brought to my attention (well, a while ago, but I > haven't had a chance to do anything about this until now) that the DOM > interfaces to SVG elements are currently defined in IDL in the SVG CR > using multiple interface inheritance. Using multiple interface > inheritance makes these interfaces *impossible* to use as is in a COM > like environment (such as Mozilla's XPCOM and Microsoft's COM), and IMO > this is something that the SVG WG should change, not only because it's > impossible to use these interfaces in COM like environments, but also > because it doesn't match the way the DOM specifications (on which the > SVG DOM is based) define interfaces, the DOM spec never uses multiple > inheritance in it's interfaces, for this very reason (and possibly others). > > What is the SVG WG's thoughts about this problem? > Does silence mean that nobody cares if the SVG DOM interfaces are un-implementable in COM like environments? -- jstReceived on Monday, 4 June 2001 08:07:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:13 GMT