- From: Robert DiBlasi <r_diblasi@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 18:02:38 +0000
- To: w3t-svg@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org, jferraio@adobe.com
W3C editor and Working Team In section 7.2 the fifth paragraph states: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/coords.html#ViewportSpace <snip> In the following example, an SVG graphic is embedded within a parent XML document which is formatted using CSS layout rules </snip> The specification would be much clearer if it would state: "In the following example, an SVG graphic is embedded inline within a parent XML document which is formatted using CSS layout rules" NOTICE: This new sentence has the term "inline" add.......this is relevant .....because a SVG Graphic (svg content) can be embedded: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/concepts.html#UsageOptions 1) by reference 2) inline 3) stand-alone 4) by link 5) referenced from CSS or XSL property Add...In fact paragraphs 3 and 4 of this section make this distinction!!!.......might be a good idea to make a linke to 2.3 in this area :-) I have look at every use of embed in the SVG specification....and I find a lot of ....." general embeds".......that do not define one of the 5 ways that is can be embeded......it really does make a difference in some sections!! It would be nice if you made this change before final 1.0 SVG Rec becomes reality :-) We All learn by sharing what we know Robert A. DiBlasi _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 14:03:10 UTC