Re: Question about Stylable SVG

I second the motion. I'm giving semi-regular presentations on SVG, and the
audience consistently embraces the power and *simplicity* of SVG. SVG will
experience enough adoption challenges as it is. Why introduce more obstacles
such as the notion of 2 SVGs? Make 1.0 something that can be easily implemented
and easily used, then expand later if appropriate.

steve




|--------+----------------------->
|        |          H

åkon Wium   |
|        |          Lie          |
|        |          <howcome@oper|
|        |          a.com>       |
|        |                       |
|        |          03/08/00     |
|        |          07:37 AM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->
  >------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                            |
  |       To:     Apu Nahasapeemapetilon <petilon@yahoo.com>   |
  |       cc:     www-svg@w3.org, (bcc: Steve Mulder/Ops/ICube)|
  |       Subject:     Re: Question about Stylable SVG         |
  >------------------------------------------------------------|



Also sprach Apu Nahasapeemapetilon:

 > Two SVGs is a terrible idea.

Indeed. My suggestion is: get the specification back on track by
removing the recently introduced "Exchange SVG".

-h&kon

Chief Technology Officer                                Opera Software
Håkon Wium Lie                     http://www.opera.com/people/howcome
howcome@opera.com                                gets you there faster