Andrew Wooldridge wrote: > > Isn't it the case that a lot of implementations out there are holding > off on releasing because SVG hasnt been finalized? That could well be true. Certainly, we don't advise shipping products to implement W3C working drafts unless they clearly mark such facilities as experimental, beta, technology preview and so forth because otherwise there is a legacy support nightmare. > What is the > timeline for moving to the next step? We are currently wainting for some of our normative references to move to the last call phase- XLink (XPointer already moved there), and SMIL Animation. DOM Level 2 is already at Candidate Recommendation, which is another normative reference from SVG. We expect these last calls to happen in the near future, although I can't pre-announce dates on their behalf. In the mean time we are polishing the wording in the spec and ensuring it has the most thorough review possible, and that we have correctly dealt with all comments arising from our own last call. So, unfortunately I can't give you an exact date for SVG moving to Proposed Rec, but it is not long off and already the breadth of implementation experience is very good. Organisations who are planning to have SVG support in shipping products once it is a Recommendation are advised to begin implementation straight away, based on the 3 December draft, because the effort of tracking changes between that and the final Recommendation will be considerably less than the effort of starting from scratch on the day it becomes a Recommendation. I will of course post news and updates to http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG as soon as there is news. -- ChrisReceived on Friday, 17 December 1999 12:33:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:18 GMT