Re: Current Downloadable Font Status....
On Aug 21, 9:15pm, Todd Fahrner wrote:
> Leaving aesthetic and legal opinions aside for a moment, my main beef with
> Netscape's implementation of TrueDoc has to do with the introduction of the
> POINT-SIZE attribute to FONT. There's both a usability issue and a
> standards issue:
I agree, but the same PFR can also be used from pukka stylesheets.
Similarly, EOTs can be used from stylesheets or from tagmesses.
> I may be ill-informed here, but is it not the case that one must specify
> both a font color and background color when one "rolls" the non-font font
> ("portable font resource")?
I would appreciate confirmation or rebuttal of this point from Bitstream.
I thought this was a scalable outline being transported.
> And what's up with the character encoding? The test page at this address:
> ...still looks like this after downloading "98% of 43K":
> http://www.verso.com/agitprop/truedoc/Xality.GIF .*
> I thought a major strength of live text/fonts over artwork was that the
> former could be searched, cut-and-pasted, etc. Yet here you've got "X"
> invoking a "Qu" ligature.
Sigh. The Microsoft pages have whole words represented by a single letter.
Lets all repeat, after three, "A sequence of bytes is not a sequence of
characters is not a sequence of glyph identifiers".
And then, "I will map my Pi characters to the Unicode Private Use Area".
> * the screwed-up text below the "Xality" line is an artifact of SmoothType,
> not of TrueDoc.
Has anyone seen the anti-aliasing of TrueType on the Be platform?
Chris Lilley, W3C [ http://www.w3.org/ ]
Graphics and Fonts Guy The World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/people/chris/ INRIA, Projet W3C
email@example.com 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 93 65 79 87 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France