Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
To: Hakon Lie <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
From: "Neil St.Laurent" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 14:57:05 -0600
CC: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Comments: Authenticated sender is <email@example.com>
From firstname.lastname@example.org Sun Aug 17 16: 53:06 1997
Organization: Big Picture Multimedia
X-Authentication-Warning: www10.w3.org: Host [188.8.131.52] claimed to be underworld.bigpic.com
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.32a)
> In what way? If a browser chooses to print in landscape mode, the
> ALIGN attribute will still work. A "landscaped" page still has a left
> and a right..
Yes, that is true, but if I'm laying things out horizontally I would
likely have a need to float things at the top and bottom of the page
as well, whereas left/right could actually mean beginning/end of
> CSS1 makes no assumptions about landscape vs. portrait and all CSS
> properties work equally well. If you disagree, please provide
I'll try to think of more, but I think lack of vertical alignment is
one of those areas, float should have top/bottom as options.
A columnar display is the major presentation that would be used in a
horizontal layout, that being lacking only tables are an option for
horizontal, but those require specific sectioning of the document.
If my layout scrolls left/right entirely I'd like some facility to
control similar layout ability that th vertical scrolling has.
An image would have need to float at the top of the page, or the
bottom of the page. In the same sense the 'clear' property would
Consider the diagrams in the CSS1 spec, they all show the next
content below the previous one, while it makes sense that collapsing
of padding/margins should work the same way horizontally, there is no
mention of it.
Consider sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2, if the spec wasn't specific to
vertical scrolling then why are these two topics (Vertical fomatting
and horizontal formatting) treating separately?
Value: <length> | <percentage> | auto
Value: <length> | auto
<percentage> should be a part of 'height' to allow for better
While the major exclusion of horizontal comes from the lack of having
column support, there are still cases where a left/right display
would be better. I believe there are Eastern languages that read
top/down as opposed to left/right? These would benefit from a
| Mortar: Advanced Web Development <http://bigpic.com/mortar/>
| Neil St.Laurent email@example.com
| Big Picture Multimedia