Re: <font> vs. CSS: no contest
To: "Douglas Rand" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: <font> vs. CSS: no contest
From: "David Perrell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 15:31:47 -0700
Cc: <email@example.com>, "Josh Paluch" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From email@example.com Fri Aug 1 18: 32:16 1997
X-Authentication-Warning: www10.w3.org: Host iceland-c.it.earthlink.net [126.96.36.199] claimed to be iceland.it.earthlink.net
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
> > BASEFONT can also be declared in the stylesheet.
> I mostly agree with this, but I wouldn't think BASEFONT and CSS1 can
> work together. BASEFONT isn't really a structural element and isn't
> inherited from. Rather the author should declare a font-size or font
> BODY or HTML and that *will* be properly inherited.
A CSS1 BASEFONT declaration in IE3.02 has no effect, but I think it
should. By the name, I'd take BASEFONT as a means to access style on
HTML, so that setting properties on BASEFONT would be the same as
setting them on HTML.