Re: font sizes in ems
Subject: Re: font sizes in ems
From: Alan Karben <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:48:29 -0400
From email@example.com Fri Jul 18 13: 45:58 1997
X-Authentication-Warning: www10.w3.org: Host [126.96.36.199] claimed to be sb2inet2.dowjones.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
At 05:36 PM 7/18/97 +0200, Hakon Lie wrote:
>In any case, it's an intersting test page. I've modified it slightly
>and put up on . It appears that MSIE4PR2 renders it correctly. NS4
>doesn't infer the P end tags and therefore have problems with the
A very helpful test page -- and thread. Thanks!
I've added a few things to this page that others may find helpful:
Specifically, I've added a new line for each font family, this time using
the px unit. Above this line, I've placed a GIF scaled to match the width
of that px text as closely as possible.
In both large- and small-font monitor settings, using MSIE4PR2, the GIF
stays exactly the same width as the text (a property we find very useful
for fitting headlines beneath logos and inside table cells). Also, with
IE4, this page prints with the same scaling as the screen. (With IE3,
anything measured in px prints in teeny, tiny letters.)
I bring the GIF and px unit in simply because it illustrates how em units
scale according to large font/small font settings, while px units do not.
Both are very useful for different layout demands.
On another note, here's the only way we came up with to deal with the
inconsistent interpretations of em units in IE3, IE4, NS, etc: Use
file to reference, and use document.write statements to write out the
<link> tag. Has anyone actually tried this to see if it works?
The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition
firstname.lastname@example.org phone: 609 520 7361
http://wsj.com fax: 609 520 7137