- From: William Perry <wmperry@aventail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 06:58:19 -0800
- To: Steve Knoblock <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
- Cc: "David Perrell" <davidp@earthlink.net>, <www-style@w3.org>, "Walter Ian Kaye" <walter@natural-innovations.com>
Steve Knoblock writes: >You also might have margins that do not crunch your text in frames or small >window sizes. But intensive industry research has shown that people don't _WANT_ things like this. They want THWUBBIDA-THWUBBIDA-BLIP-BLIP-BLIP and WIRED tags. Besides, that wasn't invented here, so it can't be good. -bp >At 02:13 AM 12/18/96 +0000, David Perrell wrote: >>Walter Ian Kaye wrote: >>> So we could use CSS to implement <BLINK> without using that tag? >>Coooooooool. >> >>This is far more exciting that that. You could implement THROB, >>FLASH-N-FADE, RANDOM-FLICKER, or even more esoteric effects such as >>THWUBBIDA-THWUBBIDA-BLIP-BLIP-BLIP.
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 1996 09:59:17 UTC