- From: Carl Morris <msftrncs@htcnet.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 18:02:41 -0600
- To: "Steve Knoblock" <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>, "WWW Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
| it kind of an overly intellectual point, but it is a good one. The "Netscape | Now" logo's are so common I doubt anyone thought it. The problem I see with | text/css only logo is that a logo is usually considered a graphical device | (or display type like a rebus). A CSS logo would just be text. And right now | you could not depend on fancy fonts being installed. You could only use | Comic Sans (which I like) and Verdana (which I don't). So how would a CSS | font look any different than what someone could do with <font>? We might | have to wait until CSS is further deployed before creating a CSS logo in CSS. Its not so much the font, as it is what you do with the letters, color, margins, maybe even a small graphic element at the base (a background?)...
Received on Friday, 22 November 1996 19:02:38 UTC