Has any one read MS's typography site?
They stated in a reply to a question about a font logo, that they feel
a graphical logo for something that expresses a textual and compact
meaning was not proper, and had refrained from use of their graphical
logo and requested others to do so by instead using a textual link with
CSS coding or FONT coding, using the mentioned fonts...
Of course their point was entire textual... CSS is very broad, but
doesn't some other people out there feel that a CSS logo done in CSS,
while it will only work completely on CSS browsers, would be more
worthwhile? Maybe a mixture? Remember that the "Netscape Now" logo's
meant nothing to a text only browser... :)
-|- Carl Morris (N0YUV) -|- 1:285/302 -|- firstname.lastname@example.org -|-
-|- Hooper Connections BBS -|- 1-(402)-654-2102 -|- 28.8kbps V.34 -|-
-|- http://126.96.36.199/~moreese/ -|- telnet://188.8.131.52 -|-
-|- Internet addresses valid from 4pm to midnight CST (UTC -0600) -|-