Re: Re:When will CSS rule?
At 10:07 AM 11/20/96 -0500, Steve Knoblock wrote:
>I agree with all these points. We may not be able to get the browser
>developers to implement them. Maybe MS is listening. I know they have a SGML
>backend for Word.
Microsoft also uses SGML massively in-house.
>>Why? It is no harder to parse <POEM> than <DIV CLASS=POEM>. Neither requires
>>a browser update. They just require a style sheet to describe how to display
>I think Carl's concern is that SGML does not specify the way an element
>should be displayed. If there were no style sheet present, then browser
>developers would have to reinvent tags soup. But I think the very fact that
>you could create an infinite number of variations on elements with SGML
>makes a style sheet a necessary prerequisite for deploying SGML on the web.
That is true. SGML without a style sheet is basically unreadable. But I
expect the text-mode browser vendors to be on the cutting edge of generic
SGML deployment. So it will only be the WYSIWYG vendors (who have no excuse)
who will hold us back.
>>HTML could never turn into SGML. It wouldn't make sense. But the "standard
>>language" of the Web could turn into SGML. This process is under way.
>That process scares me a bit. Will the DTD have to be downloaded with each
No. You no longer need the DTD to display the document. You just need the
stylesheet. This is described at http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-xml-961114.html
Boycott Shell Oil worldwide! http://www.web.apc.org/embargo/shell.htm
"Shell is here on trial and it is as well that it is represented by counsel
said to be holding a watching brief."..."The ecological war that the Company
has waged in the Delta will be called to question sooner than later." -Ken
Saro-Wiwa to the tribunal that later executed him.