- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:34:04 GMT
- To: stephanos@hol.gr
- CC: ngalarneau@concord6.powersoft.com, www-style@w3.org
>These should be depreciated. An idea would be that in Cougar, the EM, >STRONG, CODE etc. tags be given 1-letter names while B I S U etc be given >longer names to encourage useability and readability of the former. Good grief. HTML has enough prsentational markup already without *encouraging* it's use, and discouraging the use of structural markup. What on earth does <BOLD> mean to a blind user? What does <EMPH> mean? This proposal shows a very clear *misunderstanding* of the funamaental justification for CSS... or any stylesheet for that matter. Sigh.
Received on Thursday, 22 August 1996 20:36:42 UTC