Re: 'legal' / 'important' and cascading order
Subject: Re: 'legal' / 'important' and cascading order
From: email@example.com (Scott E. Preece)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 09:32:24 -0500
From firstname.lastname@example.org Fri Apr 26 10: 33:02 1996
In-Reply-To: email@example.com's message of Fri, 26 Apr 1996 16:11:37 +0200
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Wolfgang Rieger)
| On Thu, 25 Apr 1996 15:23:06 +0200, you wrote:
| >..., though it's probably overkill (I suspect 99% of style
| >sheet use will have simple selectors (all heads) and only one rule per
| Have a look at the style sheet for HTML in the draft. There you have
| indeed mostly simple selectors, but quite often more than one rule per
| element (e.g. for H1).
Well, yes and no. While there are multiple rules there for H1, they're
really all one rule, broken up for notational convenience. A smart UA
would presumably put them together into one rule.
Let me re-phrase what I said: I suspect 99% of the property
specifications in stylesheets will be retrievable by head-only searches
with no dis-ambiguation necessary.
I further suspect that if it becomes common to specify a standard
stylesheet plus author modifications, it will still be possible for a UA
to merge the stylesheets so that 99% of the property specifications are
retrievable by head-only searches with no disambiguation necessary.
Of course, we won't be able to test those suspicions for some time...
motorola/mcg urbana design center 1101 e. university, urbana, il 61801
phone: 217-384-8589 fax: 217-384-8550
internet mail: email@example.com