[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Problem with RGB value syntax



There is a problem with the proposed syntax for RGB and RRGGBB values.
Because both id-selector and RGB values are prefixed with '#', it is
not possible to use Lex in a straightforward way to implement the
lexical analyzer.

Reason: '#f00' would be '#' followed by a legal identifier, but '#0f0'
would be '#' and a number ('0') followed by an identifier ('f0').

Because of this conflict it would be necessary to make the lexical
analyzer context-sensitive, i.e. '#' in the selector part of a rule
and '#' in the declaration list would be handled different.

IMHO, it would be better to use a different prefix for RGB values
(e.g. '&').

Opinions?

Greetings

Wolfgang Rieger
Buero fuer Software-Entwicklung           Email: rieger@bse.de
                                          WWW  : http://www.bse.de/
Rosenheimer Str. 214                      Phone: +49 89 497738	
81669 Munich, Germany                     Fax  : +49 89 497738


Follow-Ups: