Re: draft-ietf-html-style-00.txt & class as a general selector

Scott E. Preece writes:

 > |   Chris Lilley wrote (in response to Scott E. Preece):
 > |   >So, in the interests of wrapping up - and knowing that you are unable to 
 > |   >attend WWW4, which is a pity as this issue will surely be discussed - 
 > |   >I would like to ask your opinion. If you could be there, and it came 
 > |   >to a vote, would you raise a blocking objection if the proposed STYLE 
 > |   >attribute was dropped, or constrained to point to a named style only?
 > At this point I would still object to dropping it.

Yes. Bert and I would not want to see this one go -- despite the good



Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France
http://www.w3.org/People/howcome  howcome@w3.org