Re: draft-ietf-html-style-00.txt & class as a general selector
Scott E. Preece writes:
> | Chris Lilley wrote (in response to Scott E. Preece):
> | >So, in the interests of wrapping up - and knowing that you are unable to
> | >attend WWW4, which is a pity as this issue will surely be discussed -
> | >I would like to ask your opinion. If you could be there, and it came
> | >to a vote, would you raise a blocking objection if the proposed STYLE
> | >attribute was dropped, or constrained to point to a named style only?
> At this point I would still object to dropping it.
Yes. Bert and I would not want to see this one go -- despite the good
Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France