Re: Re: draft-ietf-html-style-00.txt & class as a general selector

> >Tell me, if I have foo.bar, should that be followed by a trailing ] or not. 
> Why?
> Certainly not - it is not encapsulated.  There was no [ beginning the item, 
> why should there be a ] to end it?  I don't want a syntax that has a single 
> required token-delimiter, I just want some logical encapsulation.

This appears to contradict your next point:

> My point was that if you throw out the closing ], any of the characters 
> "),{" might end the selector, instead of only "]".

So you do want a single required delimiter...

Yes, they might - but unambiguously. However, if you want spurious extra 
tokens to improve the visual appearance, that is your decision.

In a somewhat tangential point, se seemed to get onto:
> >LI *is a container. What is your point here?
> *Forced* is the key word here.  Forced as in people actually use it as 
> such,  instead of doing
> <UL>
> <LI>foo
> <LI>bar
> </UL>

It is a container regardless of whether you miss off the trailing </li>. You
say you read specs so I will assume you know the difference between the tags 
in a document and the logical representation in the parse tree. </li> is 
still present in the parse tree; it is inferred by the following <li>.
But perhaps this point could be taken to private email igf you want to 
pursue it.

Chris Lilley, Technical Author and JISC representative to W3C 
|  Manchester and North Training & Education Centre   ( MAN T&EC )  |
| Computer Graphics Unit,             Email: Chris.Lilley@mcc.ac.uk |
| Manchester Computing Centre,        Voice: +44 161 275 6045       |
| Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.          Fax: +44 161 275 6040       |
| M13 9PL                            BioMOO: ChrisL                 |
| Timezone: UTC        URI: http://info.mcc.ac.uk/CGU/staff/lilley/ |